07 Oct 2013 22:43:56
Just to the post who says we unsettled sako and he refused to play twice! Are you for real? Are you that blinkered? All we did was enquired after him, wolves saidthey would sell and he showed interest. Wolves unsettled him by saying we could have him, that we had met the asking price and talks were under way, they told sako this not us, then they changed their minds. And sako didn't strike he acted in a professional manner, did you not see jacketts interview or listen to moxey? They said we had offered the right manner and sako hadnt gone on strike. So get your facts straight before you accuse anyone.
Wolves Banter Archive October 07 2013
Use our rumours form to send us wolves transfer rumours.
07 Oct 2013 22:34:19
Hands up and be honest how many wolves fans are happy with the way their club is run and how many like moxey? At forest we have an owner who does everything for the fans, who is a fan and sits and gets involved with the fans at games, outside of the stadium, he has even invited fans into the boardroom after the match. He has bought sum gud players and has installed big screen tvs at the ground ( cost a million quid). Can you honestly say you are happy with him and his cronies?
Always a sign of class - having a TV to big for your living room
DAT. agreed, Nottingham never had any class. not compared with the mighty STAGS.!
07 Oct 2013 22:26:52
Sako is a very gud player and we would like him but if we don't get him so be it, you don't get every player you bid for. Its obvious he wants to go and wolves are playing games with him, us and you the wolves fans. Without parachute payments, you would have sold him. when someone says you can have a player its normal practice to start at a lower offer. But we did offer the asking price in the end and now you got an unhappy player and are 4 million quid down money which you will need in the end. We had 2 quality players that left us this season one for free, one for 3 million and you know him very well. The point i'm trying to make is we didn't stop them, if they wanna go they wanna go, we didn't make no bones about it, we just moved on. Some of you seem to be quite bitter and that suggests unrest in the camp. Be happy, you started the campaign well, still getting gud crowds and with a bit of luck should be up a league next season.
07 Oct 2013 20:21:12
Look its simple you asked for a fee we offered, you said we want more. The second time around we said ok you want more so we said ok will give you it. Wolves said ok let's chat. Do you think for 1 minute if forest thought that geeedy wolves would want a million pound loan fee and to loan a very gud player from us we would entertain the idea? I very much doubt it. Realise if you drop from the prem and get a quality player and promise a return to the big time and then after a season i'm sure you all want to forget, you drop down again, this mite make the player think what I have done? We have been there and know what its all about. Every club enquires about other clubs players, that's all we have done. If wolves and the player had said no in the first place that would have been end of. So get over yourselves realise your board are a shambles and stop criticising forest for acting properly. Oh hang on maybe I should run to the press with this rant or just wait till the morning and talk to tv.
Why don't you forest with all this money you pretend to have pay up or shut up he his our player until we decide any different makes me think why mcarthy didn't want to manage your club when interviewed for the job your all promises
07 Oct 2013 14:57:09
Just to say first you wanted 3 and a half million we offered you less eventually we met your valuation and you moved the goalposts and asked for more so we said no. Then we came back and offered you 4 million in january if we loaned him till then. You agreed, we talked then you got greedy and wanted more, 1 million loan payment, add ons plus to loan one of our best young players. This is bad business from your board. First we enquired about sako, he showed interest and your board showed interest in selling because they said meet our valuation and you can have him. We met the valuations, your board said let's talk and they kept changing their minds. They have made themselves look like fools, us look like fools and sako look like a fool. He must be seriously miffed in all of this and can you blame him? Your board kept running to the press not us and as wolves fans surely you must find the whole thing embarrassing, from what I've read its not the first time the wolves board have acted in an undignified way. Look how they treated mcarthy with half a dozen games to go in the prem and left that poor coach to pick up the pieces. Ok maybe mick wasn't gud enuff to be a prem boss but limited funds, injuries worked miracles to keep you up first time and would you really be where you are now if you had kept him? To be a yo yo club is not great but 2day the money in the prem is astronomical and all that money gained from being up and down the leagues eventually mite have been enuff to keep you up. I think it was a knee jerk reaction from your board and ultimately the fans pay. Anyway rant over, just remember we asked about sako and acted accordingly offering the money asked, it was moxey who moved the posts!
07 Oct 2013 16:58:28
If you have ever tried to buy a house or a car you would know that the deal is not finished until both sides sign the contract. Same with players. Its not like walking in to Stars and buying a kit kat.
How do you know this?
Why does everyone think Mick didn't spend much, have a look at what we spent in the 3 years in the prem, pretty sure we were in the top 10 spenders so stop with the myth that he had a shoe string budget, he just simply didn't spend it very well. (take our spending and compare with WBA for example).
As for Sako, if you didn't pay a loan fee does that mean we can go and loan a replacement from another club and simply say 'we won't pay a loan fee as Forest haven't paid us one'?
You want to take our 1st choice left winger in January then fine as we can use the money to buy a replacement, however, if you want him now surely its common sense you pay for that premium?
The original fee set out during the window, no deal was agreed thus we didn't get a replacement, to then take him when we would have very limited options in the way of replacements rightly should attract an additional charge!
And that would apply the other way round if it was us after a Forest player!
Daz
07 Oct 2013 17:54:58
He/she doesn't. This is business, Forest and their fans should grow up.
He must be daft to want to play for forest.you will not go up, we will go up, and the year after we will be in the premier league.sako might then be allowed to go .because our youngsters will keep him out the team, we, re steamin
For your information I am so glad Mccarthy and his cronies aren't here anymore. onwards and upwards!
Nature dictates that Wolves take a wander in the wilderness. A forest always stands still and produces planks.
You forest fans want to get in the real world now you think you have got all this money if you want sako pay the going rate or shut up we are not bothered we are on a winner either way we can still win without him and win with him what hurts you his the fact we can afford to keep hm in div.1 and not many clubs can do that that's why you have tried it on and tried to get him on the cheap but you have come up agst the wrong guy in moxey never mind you will have him in january. wolfy
Not choking pal because I don't like soup. Dream on about patterson there is no chance he going to drop down to the third tier to play hoof up the park football. He will get plenty of proper football in this season
08 Oct 2013 10:54:25
"A forest always stands still and produces planks."
ha that made me laugh. Planks when it comes to doing business anyway. The football world knows that Moxey is good at business even if what he does isn't always what the fans want.