Wolves Rumours Member Posts

 

Deep Throat's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Deep Throat's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Deep Throat's Posts

 

 

To Deep Throat's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Deep Throat's last 5 banter posts

 

To Deep Throat's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Deep Throat's last 5 banter replies

 

Deep Throat's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Deep Throat's rumours posts

 

17 Aug 2023 14:26:07
We're linked with Josh Brownhill of Burnley.

Deep Throat

1.) 17 Aug 2023 15:41:23
God I hope not, bang average player. I'd sooner see Hodge or Jordao play to be honest! ?


2.) 17 Aug 2023 16:29:46
See Paul merson predicts Brighton win he always goes against us plus he says we can't and won't score he talks out his ass h.i never had liked him I go for a wolves win 3-1


3.) 17 Aug 2023 17:15:01
I’d rather us sign Josh Burnley, from Brownhills.


4.) 17 Aug 2023 17:22:50
Paul Merson keeps whistling the same old boring tune. Wolves 'don't score'. Therefore we will never score, right? Wrong! A team that never scores would not have stayed up last season. He may not have noticed that we finished very comfortably in 13th place last season in spite of VAR errors for which we have received several apologies. And he gets paid for writing this drivel? My prediction?
Wolves 2, Brighton 1.


5.) 17 Aug 2023 17:30:08
Deep, I’ve gone for a 2-1 win on me Super6. We can’t both be wrong, surely not


6.) 17 Aug 2023 18:43:13
He isn't a bad player to have for depth tbf but given the source it's come from I think a rumour is all it is mate.


7.) 17 Aug 2023 19:08:46
Who knows we're could run riot.its about time we battered a team


8.) 17 Aug 2023 19:41:59
Let's see guys as wolfy46 says we could run riot but it's still early days.


9.) 17 Aug 2023 20:31:57
We may not score many but we still managed to beat Liverpool, Chelsea, Spurs, Brentford and Villa at Molineux last season. Let Merson say what he wants and when we don't lose or get relegated, watch him, Gabby and Chris Sutton all suddenly say that they always felt Wolves were a decent side.


10.) 18 Aug 2023 10:04:47
Liverpool are sniffing around for Lamina, well they can think again and keep their grubby little hands off him, unless they plan to pay £200m for him and in cash not instalments. that's what I think.


11.) 22 Aug 2023 20:43:37
Liverpool so called only paid £5 million out of 45 million in Jota deal.


 

 

31 Jan 2022 11:11:26
Apparently we are favourites ahead of Rangers to sign Aaron Ramsey. He is going to take a massive wage cut, and Juve will pay him to leave. As for Rangers, they can sign Gordon Ramsay for all I care! Might improve the half-time pies in Glasgow!

Deep Throat

1.) 31 Jan 2022 11:44:19
According to his autobiography, Gordon did play for Rangers.


2.) 31 Jan 2022 11:53:40
According to The Daily Record, a deal between Rangers and Juve for AR has been agreed upon. Would've been a great addition, I'm going to be a negative Nelly and reiterate we will have no incomings today (sadly). Happy to be wrong though!


3.) 31 Jan 2022 12:03:23
I hope you are wrong Debbie else we will be looking at a third Jan in a row when we have ended the month in a similar or more likely worse position to where we started it! Fosun keep telling us there's no deals to be done, let's see shall we cause other teams seem to be managing?! ?


4.) 31 Jan 2022 13:07:38
Do we really want a overpaid injury prone midfielder?
Whether juve subsidised Ramsey's wage he's still not a good addition in my book.
I would like to see a extra striker come in but with hwang to come back I think we should have enough to cement a top ten finish.


5.) 31 Jan 2022 13:16:50
Jas, an update on the illustrious footballing career of Gordon Ramsay:
According to his autobiography Ramsay played "a couple of non-league matches as a trialist for Rangers."

He has since admitted that the exact ins-and-outs of his time at Rangers are "hazy" and according to a Rangers spokesperson he was given a trial during a testimonial match and trained with them for a few months.


6.) 31 Jan 2022 14:09:27
@ Deep Throat and Jas M - The News Of The World debunked Gordon Ramsay's claims about being a Rangers player. HE wasn't released by the club, he had trials for two weeks. This is the only time I can praise NOTW.

It all came about when Ramsay claimed on a TV program that was "released as a 17-year-old and was crushed, that is how I ended up becoming a chef" (I remember watching it) it even had Rangers legend Ally McCoist recalling GR as a young player. Hilarious, egg on both their faces.


7.) 31 Jan 2022 14:59:33
Debbie, amazing how high-achievers still feel the need to cheat! We see it in football all the time with Sterling/Kane etc diving. That tennis player banned from Aussie Open made multiple false statements.


8.) 31 Jan 2022 16:07:56
Deep Throat - I think this boils down to the ruthless "win at all costs mentality" it is drilled into athletes through all disciplines at an early age.

Look at some of the best forwards, they were very crafty. Bergkamp, Shearer, Henry or more recetnly Jota. They didn't cheat but knew /know how to draw a foul and stick in some strong challenges of their own.


9.) 31 Jan 2022 16:19:07
Strange how we’re favourites to sign players but as soon as another Club throws their hat in the ring Wolves pull out, not even willing to compete with Rangers for Ramsay.


10.) 31 Jan 2022 17:54:00
Wolves transfer strategy this window seemed to be younger players. Hoping the gamble pays off.


11.) 31 Jan 2022 18:15:44
Sorry Debs but a 'gamble' would suggest money has been spent, whereas all Fosun seem to be doing it saving pennies where ever they can! Unless of course its lining Gestufutes pocket as they seem very happy to do that (at the expense of our own transfer budget I might add)!
We lose one of our best players and replace him with a player who's only up to being sent to Grasshopper?! People will say that Fosun are being clever and they'd be right, fifth highest average season ticket in the league and replacing our best players with kids! You can call it clever I call it shameless ?


12.) 31 Jan 2022 19:55:06
Well that's it for this window according to Sky News.


 

 

25 Apr 2020 13:24:40
Olympiacos about to be banned for match fixing according to a report today. Oh dear, we have unfinished business with them at Molineux. I wonder if a ban would affect this?

Deep Throat

1.) 26 Apr 2020 05:56:11
I saw that. Saying they are likely to be relegated to the Greek second league. I imagine they will also be blanket banned from all comps. With us going straight through.


2.) 26 Apr 2020 19:00:34
Funny old world if we went through to quarter finals that way. Not half as funny as Alan Pardew being saved from relegation, miles from safety, and all because the Dutch league has been declared null and void. Pardew claims he is not taking his bonus for avoiding relegation. Would have paid for a few taxis in Barcelona!


3.) 26 Apr 2020 23:58:29
This is probably academic anyway (as it could all be cancelled) but would it come into force this season then? Surely any punative measures they got would happen for the next tournament? Otherwise it wouldn't be fair on those teams they've already knocked out of the tournament? 🤔.


4.) 27 Apr 2020 08:41:35
Got a point there TBF bullys. Man City wouldn't get immediately kicked out of the CL for their mishaps. We will find out I'm sure. The resumption in August for european tournaments has been banded around a lot.


 

 

07 Jul 2016 16:54:52
today. Don't know if it is just Kenny keeping his hand in, or is it from Robin Li's side?

Real Betis, Aston Villa and Wolves are all interested in signing Chelsea striker Patrick Bamford on loan.

Deep Throat

1.) 07 Jul 2016 18:54:15
Decent player but hopefully we'll not need loan captures soon! This waiting's tough, you could cut the atmosphere with a 'boing boing'. Talking of which, maybe we could buy WBA, flatten the Hawthorns and turn it into a car park for away fans whom we could transport to Molineux by High Speed Tram?


2.) 07 Jul 2016 20:39:57
I'm new to this site guys . Been watching all the posts from the last few days though. Really hoping for good news very soon. FWAW.


 

 

09 May 2016 18:27:35
To all you takeover conspiracy theorists, I can add something new and factual. This info is from banking contacts: The Lone Star chairman, John Grayken, is moving back to Boston in the USA. That implies he is less likely to be buying Wolves. Lone Star own The Money Shop.

Of course, you can live in the USA AND own an English football club.

Deep Throat

1.) 09 May 2016 19:28:42
Ellis Short owns Lone Star and Sunderland FC. Is he allowed to control 2 clubs in the same country?


2.) 09 May 2016 20:22:35
I think Ellis Short is just his partner and owns Sunderland himself, rather through Lone-Star, Grayken isn't involved in Sunderland so could buy Wolves (maybe in his own right, or through Lone-Star, or through it's subsidiary Dollar) .

There's only circumstantial evidence linking Grayken anyway, but that's the same for every buyer suggested, and it is by far the largest amount of circumstantial evidence out of those rumoured. And, the rumours about him buying were about long time before Moneyshop (his Company) became main sponsors (which no one seemed to expect and is highly suspect, because it makes the club less saleable to anyone but Moneyshop, and it could be a trick allowing them to beat FFP) .


3.) 09 May 2016 23:46:17
The club is being sold to Bob Laslett, how many more times doi need to tell you?


4.) 10 May 2016 09:39:02
I know, but then that makes Moxey's Moneyshop deal make no sense all, because if Moneyshop aren't buying and the sponsorship was just ordinary business, then it harmed the clubs reach and potential for no good purpose and made it significantly less saleable.

I'd imagine Laslett would have had to have known about the sponsorship and either agreed it wouldn't deter him buying and he'd keep it (and so suffer the fan rebellion about it) , or agreed he'd pay to have it cancelled, which I have serious trouble believing. I also have trouble believing Morgan would walk away at this point, with Moneyshop engaged, as his reputation and legacy is currently in tatters and will be for $$$$ if he doesn't stay and put some of it right.

So until it's definitely announced I remain sceptical, both that it is Laslett and that if so, it's automatically a good thing. We shall see :-)


5.) 10 May 2016 10:30:38
Just a thought but I might be wrong, remember a lot of the newcastle players went on strike when they announced a deal with WONGA due their religion. Could us being sponsored by the money shop have the same affect on any buyers from say the middle east/ far east?


6.) 10 May 2016 11:26:53
That's a very good point, I think it could be seen as usury, which is a no-no in original Christianity and so probably in much of Africa. I guess though you could say the same about gambling or alcohol sponsorship with Islam, but then they'd be anti-usury too. So yes - it would rule out a buyer from a lot of other religious cultures and probably more than any other product sponsored would.

This religious aspect would also have a bearing on WWFC's supporter reach as it makes Wolves unsupportable to some cultures, making it an even worse fit for Wolves considering it's culturally diverse region.

Definitely the biggest hit though will be what the English middle class and rural will think. If we were Baggies, it wouldn't matter so much, because like Newcastle FC with Wonga, their identity is already working class and urban, so while still ugly, Moneyshop wouldn't change their identity and lesson their reach.

Wolves though had a glamorous inclusive identity that is conflicted by class limited and urban Moneyshop, Wolves does traditionally have big middle class and rural support (eg Elgar ) , many of whom won't tolerate Moneyshop as part of their identity. So Moneyshop is going to harm Wolves current support and will kill it's reach and so potential to be a properly big club again.

If Moneyshop aren't buying and if they haven't paid Wolves many many millions for this sponsorship, Moxey is a crazy whose sold Wolves out way too cheap. If he's not sacked for agreeing Moneyshop at all, he should be sacked for getting Wolves fleeced by them by agreeing the deal way too cheap.


7.) 10 May 2016 11:37:41
Banbury.
I hear you. You're either completely right or completely wrong. Bob Laslett would be infinitely preferable to Money Shop as a buyer. As Ulf says above, the Money Shop deal doesn't make sense if Laslett is buying in. And yes, a potential player from a Muslim background would have objections to a Wonga-type sponsor.


8.) 10 May 2016 11:57:43
Honestly religion now! Whens the Pope postin! If someone wants to invest in our club accept it with both hands! We were in The Money Shop stand at Forest! I couldn't hear anybody moanin! The high street is full with money lenders and bettin shops! Wakey Wakey its 2016! I bet not all abromovics money at Chelsea hasn't come by legit means? Can't hear Chelsea fans moanin!


9.) 10 May 2016 12:04:07
@Banbury - any idea when the sale will be announced?


10.) 10 May 2016 12:21:37
The funny thing is about Notts Forest Moneyshop stand, is Moneyshop is a Nottingham based company, it's where their head office is, and where they employ hundreds of people. So why hasn't Notts Forest agreed a special relationship with that major local employer and let them on their shirts instead of Wolves?

Cuz Notts Forest is a glamorous inclusive club like Wolves, that includes middle class and rural support, and who wouldn't brand themselves Moneyshop for anything as they know it would change their identity and kill their reach and potential to be big again. A sponsored stand makes no difference, it's just advertising space, shirts are different though, it's the clubs identity. Forest probably have pro marketing consultants who told them what a suicidal idea it would be, unlike Wolves who rely on totally amateur and incompetent Moxey.

And re religion, I'm guessing the Pope is going to be a fan next season, considering our green hoopy socks making us look like Black Country Celtic.

Honestly, if this was a Viz comic strip it would be too unlikely to be funny.


11.) 10 May 2016 12:47:23
If that's the case they want to go and ask Money Shop for a loan as their ground is lookin tired and could do with a makeover!


12.) 10 May 2016 13:13:02
I agree, Forest does look tired, but I guess they know their heroic identity and it's potential reach is their biggest asset by far, and they're worth much more with that protected and intact, than with it sold out for money that might make them look more flush for now, but would lose them all their future potential to be something again.

Like, apparently, you can tell a gentlemen / well off person by if they have good shoes, they can otherwise wear total tat. Moneyshop is like the shoes, bad cheap shoes, wear a Saville Row suit with bad cheap shoes, you're still a scrub, only an embarrassing one trying too hard :-) lol, we should check out Moxey's shoes (although I doubt he's seen his own feet for decades) .


13.) 10 May 2016 13:20:26
Paul T,
It's not just religious objections to money-lenders. It's also the fact that some companies prey on vulnerable people. That's beyond doubt and has been discussed fully on this forum already. It's not just moneylenders. The Russian owner of Chelsea seems to have made his wealth by getting hold of publicly-owned assets at a fraction of what they were worth. That's stealing from the Russian people. The breweries and tobacco companies etc could also be held to account. Where do you draw the line? I don't know. If John Grayken, the Lone Star guy, buys Wolves, I won't like the way he has made his money but I will give him a fair hearing at Wolves and hope it works out for all concerned.


14.) 10 May 2016 13:28:23
But if moneyshop and it's like is so despised by anyone from a Muslim background why would forest have a moneyshop named stand?
Are they not owned by a Muslim businessman?
All this b****x about it ruining the clubs wider appeal is frankly outdated.
The great majority don't care where the money comes from as long as it brings success.
Just ask Chelsea and Man City fans.


15.) 10 May 2016 13:50:00
To an extent I agree Deep Throat, especially about Abramovich, saw a BBC doc about the poor who live in the Russian regions he's Governor of - takes their oil and gas resources and spends it on his own super luxury and on Chelsea, while those Russian poor live in Siberian conditions, in draughty sheds without heating, having to drink vodka 24/ 7 as anti-freeze to stay alive. Sickening. Grayken's money is much better than that, but there are other concerning things about Grayken.

He took Irish citizenship, but according to their press, is best known in Ireland for buying portfolio's of distressed mortgages and evicting people, in Ireland he's apparently known as Mr. Bailiff. We have good support in Ireland. Then there's the involvement he had in South Korean banks, that led to a criminal investigation (although don't know what findings were and not implying he was guilty) , but where he apparently made significant financial pledges in Court, that having left the Country he apparently never honoured. And, was apparently quite happy to leave some of his colleagues there to go to jail for it. Then there's what official rich analysis reviews in America claim, that almost everyone who has worked with him and trusted him has regretted it. That's just from half an hour googling foreign press reports.

So there's a definite trust issue, he could promise the Earth about good intentions but who knows. He may well want to buy the club, push a load of money into it around FFP via sub-prime Moneyshop sponsorship, get promoted by buying league (maybe £40m, + £30m to buy club) , then sells Wolves as Prem club for £100m, fast turn around big profit, exactly as per all his other vulture fund businesses. But to get fast sale and most money, he'd probably sell to anyone and that could be awful. Mind you, as long as we were Prem, that may be good enough for some supporters.

But in principle, I agree, I have my own moral issues with Moneyshop that make me very unhappy the club is partnered with them. But my biggest concern is how it will damage Wolves identity, reach, and potential. If Grayken is buying and Moneyshop sponsorship will be seen in hindsight as just a temporary trick to get a load of investment round FFP, so it's a wrong to beat a bigger unfair wrong (FFP rules) , and if we did get to Prem Moneyshop sponsorship was dropped so we weren't branded to the Nation as that, it could work out ok. Roller coast ride with big fear, but at least there'd be some hope too.


16.) 10 May 2016 14:05:09
Ulf your clearly hung up on class issue, well sorry mate but get real please class does not come into it neither does your rural theory. I would also hazard a bet that out of the 13000 on line signitures against the Money Market are not even Wolves fans.


17.) 10 May 2016 14:16:53
Re Bigcheese, the word sponsorship is overused and abused. Stands aren't really sponsored at all, it's just poncy jargon the clubs use to try and increase the perceived value of what they're selling. Stands are inanimate objects not involved in the competition, so they can't be sponsored, they're just advertising space. Exactly like the crash barriers and bridges on F1 circuits, just background scenery, don't reflect on teams like sponsors names on cars that are competing do.

That's all Forest (and us with John Ireland Stand, now SJH stand since May15) did having Moneyshop pay for their name to be on them. It doesn't reflect on or affect the identity of the club in anyway. But main sponsor, sponsoring the shirt (worn by the players who are competing) , worn by the fans who support them, with Moneyshop named as our sponsor-partner, we'd be actually playing for Moneyshop. We're being asked to support Moneyshop. That's a massive change in identity and a massive barrier that lose Wolves support and revenue, like stand advertising never could.


18.) 10 May 2016 14:43:52
Ulf.
If Grayken is buying us you could be right about Money Shop being a temporary ruse to get round FFP, with MS eventually being dropped. The rumour about re-locating Wolves to a new build site could also be part of an old pal's agreement with Morgan to develop Molineux for housing. As unsettling as all of this is, it can only really work with us being established in the PL. The ends could justify the means.

If Banbury Wolf is right and we get Bob Laslett, where does that leave the Money Shop sponsorship? I don't know.


19.) 10 May 2016 14:51:39
First of all Notts Forest is owned by a Muslim. Fawaz al-Hasawi so sorry that out with what you are saying about a stand at the City Ground.
Now Moxey that nice ratbag of a CEO of ours takes Money Ship as a main sponsor. This will rule out potential buyers from the middle East and Asia for obvious reasons, that small point will have some bearing on his decision rest assured of that.
Ulf please stop this sociological wishy washy stuff it's really tedious and I do not believe it is accurate either. So rural Salop has more Wolves fans than the working class West Midlands? Never in a million years. I accept your point of view is your right but enough please.


20.) 10 May 2016 14:58:05
Forgot 2 points
1 Money Shop sponsorship is £1.5 million maximum may be a bit less, so hardly affects selling price
2 KJ took over Wolves on 31 May so his 12 month contract still valid and running. Aha but I forgot if they say good bye still have to pay him 1 years money anyway, so forget I spoke as just talked myself out of what I was about to say to Paul T! Lol
He ain't going mate I an telling you.


21.) 10 May 2016 15:01:22
Ulf call it what you like they are basically the same thing if you think that it offends a Muslim based regime so much why would forest have it all over there stand?
You and a few others on here are getting your knickers in a twist over nothing in my opinion.
The club needed a sponsor/ advertiser call it what you will and moneyshop have payed what the club wanted. Job done in my opinion.
I think your premice that we become a tainted brand because we have moneyshop on our shirts is in this day and age is laughable.
They may not be the most appealing name for our shirt but the neither was Doritos.
Now there was a branding error!


22.) 10 May 2016 15:15:22
There's a reason I'm hung up on it, identity and meaning is where my head is naturally stuck at (along with Wolves, so it's a bad collision) . Always has been, which is why I ended up working at a reasonably high level in marketing, because I can only do what I can naturally do. And I know from how my head naturally is, from working in marketing (including brand marketing and on Man U and Newcastle FC credit cards) , and from later on working in marketing for football pools, this is how the English football scene, and English culture and market is.

The modern World, England and Mid/ North Wales, is increasingly without class, more an artisan meritocracy where individuals transcend class (it's how rural has been for ages) . They want to associate with things that are attractive by being real and having integrity but are still exciting, like they want to be seen as. Wolves glamorous inclusive heroic heritage (and the regions original grass roots artisan / small and medium sized business and enterprise heritage) naturally fits that perfectly, it's hugely attractive, like Man U's but as a seed. The urban working class clubs though, like Baggies, Everton, Brum, don't fit the modern world, if they want to have more support and be bigger clubs than just their urban locals, they need to evolve and be more glamorous and inclusive, less class defined. And most of them are trying to.

With Moneyshop though, Moxey is taking Wolves into being working class and urban (when we aren't) , and it's exactly the wrong direction for the modern World. It will harm Wolves current support but won't kill Wolves, it will though give them a glass ceiling and make it much harder to ever be a big club with big National support ever again. It will hurt a small amount forever, be a brick wall ahead and add up to serious damage.

Fingers crossed Moneyshop gets cancelled, or is just a FFP trick that will get us to Prem then be dropped, and be seen in hindsight as a maverick heroic 2 fingers up at the establishment to beat their unfairness :-)

(and it doesn't matter if they're not Wolves fans. Deduct the Newky fans who have their own chip and allegiance, the rest are indicative that Wolves are a much less attractive, inclusive, and supportable club because of Moneyshop. Current Wolves fans aren't the biggest issue, it's the potential for more, our reach that Moneyshop really kills and that the petition volume suggests) .


23.) 10 May 2016 15:22:46
Molineux CANNOT be developed, Wolves took out a 999 year lease on the stadium plot. The council also put a clause it to say it will always be a football stadium. They chose not to give Wolves/ Morgan a free hold, because they feared he would do exactly as you said.


24.) 10 May 2016 14:51:39
First of all Notts Forest is owned by a Muslim. Fawaz al-Hasawi so sorry that out with what you are saying about a stand at the City Ground.
Now Moxey that nice ratbag of a CEO of ours takes Money Ship as a main sponsor. This will rule out potential buyers from the middle East and Asia for obvious reasons, that small point will have some bearing on his decision rest assured of that.
Ulf please stop this sociological wishy washy stuff it's really tedious and I do not believe it is accurate either. So rural Salop has more Wolves fans than the working class West Midlands? Never in a million years. I accept your point of view is your right but enough please.


25.) 10 May 2016 14:58:05
Forgot 2 points
1 Money Shop sponsorship is £1.5 million maximum may be a bit less, so hardly affects selling price
2 KJ took over Wolves on 31 May so his 12 month contract still valid and running. Aha but I forgot if they say good bye still have to pay him 1 years money anyway, so forget I spoke as just talked myself out of what I was about to say to Paul T! Lol
He ain't going mate I an telling you.


26.) 10 May 2016 15:01:22
Ulf call it what you like they are basically the same thing if you think that it offends a Muslim based regime so much why would forest have it all over there stand?
You and a few others on here are getting your knickers in a twist over nothing in my opinion.
The club needed a sponsor/ advertiser call it what you will and moneyshop have payed what the club wanted. Job done in my opinion.
I think your premice that we become a tainted brand because we have moneyshop on our shirts is in this day and age is laughable.
They may not be the most appealing name for our shirt but the neither was Doritos.
Now there was a branding error!


27.) 10 May 2016 15:15:22
There's a reason I'm hung up on it, identity and meaning is where my head is naturally stuck at (along with Wolves, so it's a bad collision) . Always has been, which is why I ended up working at a reasonably high level in marketing, because I can only do what I can naturally do. And I know from how my head naturally is, from working in marketing (including brand marketing and on Man U and Newcastle FC credit cards) , and from later on working in marketing for football pools, this is how the English football scene, and English culture and market is.

The modern World, England and Mid/ North Wales, is increasingly without class, more an artisan meritocracy where individuals transcend class (it's how rural has been for ages) . They want to associate with things that are attractive by being real and having integrity but are still exciting, like they want to be seen as. Wolves glamorous inclusive heroic heritage (and the regions original grass roots artisan / small and medium sized business and enterprise heritage) naturally fits that perfectly, it's hugely attractive, like Man U's but as a seed. The urban working class clubs though, like Baggies, Everton, Brum, don't fit the modern world, if they want to have more support and be bigger clubs than just their urban locals, they need to evolve and be more glamorous and inclusive, less class defined. And most of them are trying to.

With Moneyshop though, Moxey is taking Wolves into being working class and urban (when we aren't) , and it's exactly the wrong direction for the modern World. It will harm Wolves current support but won't kill Wolves, it will though give them a glass ceiling and make it much harder to ever be a big club with big National support ever again. It will hurt a small amount forever, be a brick wall ahead and add up to serious damage.

Fingers crossed Moneyshop gets cancelled, or is just a FFP trick that will get us to Prem then be dropped, and be seen in hindsight as a maverick heroic 2 fingers up at the establishment to beat their unfairness :-)

(and it doesn't matter if they're not Wolves fans. Deduct the Newky fans who have their own chip and allegiance, the rest are indicative that Wolves are a much less attractive, inclusive, and supportable club because of Moneyshop. Current Wolves fans aren't the biggest issue, it's the potential for more, our reach that Moneyshop really kills and that the petition volume suggests) .


28.) 10 May 2016 15:22:46
Molineux CANNOT be developed, Wolves took out a 999 year lease on the stadium plot. The council also put a clause it to say it will always be a football stadium. They chose not to give Wolves/ Morgan a free hold, because they feared he would do exactly as you said.


29.) 10 May 2016 16:01:07
Sorry, double post?

Anyway, I could go on for ages referencing things to justify it but it's boring, I don't mind people don't see it and don't agree, but it doesn't stop it being true. I've no agenda at all other than what's best for Wolves long term (club and region) .

(and I never suggested Shropshire had more Wolves supporters than urban West Mids at all. But do you really think Wolves are best placed to compete in that urban West Mids market as an urban working class club (effectively same identity as Baggies have traditionally) , against the Baggies who are that but Prem and way ahead of us? Or at the other end of the market, against Villa, who are glam and inclusive / not-class-defined (like Wolves were upto Moneyshop) , and more Prem than us, and more likely to be Prem again sooner than us? As Moneyshop Wolves, we lose to both Baggies and Villa. And with West Mids market is exhausted (portions already won by whichever club and with all shifts away from Wolves) , where else are Wolves going to get new support from to be a big club again? Newcastle have a working class identity and are in a perfect position to exploit their region (so isolated it's effectively a monopoly) . But their working class identity gives them a glass ceiling, will never be bigger than they are, because they appeal to no one but their own. Unlike Newcastle (or Everton, but like Liverpool or Man U) , Wolves were a heroic glam inclusive everyman's club, Moneyshop risks ending that.


30.) 10 May 2016 16:33:16
Re Derbywolf, not sure but I think the £1.5m figure was from trade press speculation, I don't believe WWFC disclosed the amount - they may have hinted but I wouldn't trust them if it's big and they're trying to keep it quiet to stop transfer fee inflation.

And even if it is only £1.5m, it might be another bit in compensation to Moneyshop to cancel, plus if shirts and merchandising stuff already printed, wasted stock and replacement - maybe £2m to £2.5m total (and possibly too late to get other sponsor to make up loss and hassle with getting new clean merchandising stock) - that's a player fee, a meaningful dent in FFP spend, and a nasty hit for a new owner or Morgan to take (getting on for 10% of the actual total club sale price) .

And real problem is once Moneyshop has gone live and is established it will change WWFC's identity, reduce its attractiveness and inclusivity, and so reduce its reach and potential. So if we don't sell this Summer and Moneyshop does go live, then Wolves would be less of a good investment and less saleable going forward.

I wouldn't be worried, Moneyshop sponsorship is so crazy I'd assume it must be a clever FFP trick and will work out ok. But I remember that Moxey has previously always identified Wolves with Everton, when that's wrong in the same way as this. Wolves are the regions glamorous heroic club like Liverpool FC, Baggies are like urban working class Everton. I suspect we have Moneyshop, simply because Moxey is a marketing wannabe / amateur who doesn't understand the clubs true identity or potential.


31.) 10 May 2016 17:14:06
I asked the religion question just to see peoples thoughts, my personal opinion is had wolves been promoted this season or at least got in to the play offs I don't think a lot of fans would have an issue with the Moneyshop deal and I think due to the season we've had it's another good reason to have a go at the club, I do however think the deal does damage our image and I most likely won't be purchasing the kit for my own reasons ( don't suit v necks or green) but were clearly a club that puts money before the fans these days so I just hope we get a new owner who changes that.


32.) 10 May 2016 17:27:55
ULF did you kick up a fuss when Sporting Bet was announced? Isn't gambling against Muslim values and I'm sure gambling has been more detrimental than any money lenders.
I don't believe for one minute that the Moneyshop owners are remotely interested in owning Wolves and see the 3 year sponsorship as meerly a commercial deal. As stated so many times we are the last to know on everything. Let's look at it did anyone foresee the Moneyshop sponsor NO it was leaked a few hours before and now a contract has been signed it will not be changed. The same as news on new owners, Jacket leaving and transfers. It has made me laugh in the past some of the rumours but it's getting all a bit childish and throwing toys out of the pram!


33.) 10 May 2016 17:38:57
Deego Wolf.
Good point about the freehold having to be a football ground. However these things can change by agreement. The old St George's Hospital on Hyde Park Corner in London had a wonderful location, world class. The lease had a clause saying it always had to be a hospital, otherwise it would revert to the freeholder, the Duke of Westminster. Guess what? The hospital is long gone and on the site is the mega-expensive Lansborough Hotel! In other words, clauses can be broken!


34.) 10 May 2016 18:02:50
Deego I don't think that Morgan would wish to involve himself in a development dispute over the Mol. But if he did and appealed to central government to build residential properties and move the ground to an out of town site he would probably win. Appeals like this are overturning Local Authority decisions all over the country. Its all linked to the housing shortage. Mr Morgan has all the people in place and knows exactly what buttons to press.


35.) 10 May 2016 19:06:08
Ulf,

I like the analogy of Liverpool and Everton compared to Wolves and Albion. Spot on. About time we got back into the top flight to prove the point. The steps we are taking now are very significant for our future, and are not to be taken lightly. This is a great club. I have much more faith in Morgan to understand this rather than Moxey. Morgan must now act in the best interests of Wolves, rather than for strictly commercial reasons. That may even mean retaining ownership and re-investing. I'd like to see Moxey out, and I would consider hiring someone like the Norwich CEO who honourably resigned this week.


36.) 10 May 2016 20:23:24
I agree Deep Throat, I have faith in Morgan, I'd be happy if he stayed. And good shout on the Norwich CEO - the best people make mistakes, take the hit and learn from them, and by that improve and become better than others - perhaps like the Norwich guy has and like Moxey never seems to.

Re Darbo. Sportingbet sponsorship wasn't a big deal because betting is a natural part of football, so it didn't change our identity and lesson our potential (relative to anyone else) . And not like sportingbet are a bookie of last resort, like Moneyshop are a lender to the desperate. So it's not as exploitative, and critically, not at all down market. It wasn't great, we should have taken less money and a better quality name, but not a disaster. I did hate it though because of the colour clash, like Dorito's, spoiled a couple of shirts I desperately wanted.

And those bad colour clashes are another example how Moxey has been completely incompetent with Wolves identity - he just slaps it around like it doesn't matter when actually it's our greatest asset. But I guess no surprise he treats the shirt like it's a cheap made up basketball franchise (he did used to run one) .

Re Wolvesfan03 - I think actually if we'd got promoted and Moneyshop were announced for next season in the Prem, there'd be much more aggro about it not less, because with Prem revenue there'd be no justification at all that we're desperate for the money, and it would be a disaster if we were in Prem as Moneyshop, would destroy Wolverhampton's reputation to the Nation like Wonga did Blackpool, whole region would be on WWFC's back about it, not just the football fans. Who wants to go shopping to, or live in, or move to a place branded to the Nation as a pay-day loan society? Would harm the regions regeneration.


 

 

 

Deep Throat's banter posts with other poster's replies to Deep Throat's banter posts

 

25 Jan 2024 14:55:09
Fabio Silva is still waiting for his first goal at Rangers. He was subbed at 73 minutes in the 3-0 win last night. BBC report said that he will take time to get up to full sharpness.

Deep Throat

1.) 25 Jan 2024 17:28:50
Sorry but he should be a superstar at that level. I read that he had some decent touches, but missed a glaring opportunity. I do hope this works out for him and ultimately us, but I have my doubts.


2.) 26 Jan 2024 02:51:33
If he can't hack it up there then may be best to cut our losses and get a mutual agreement to end his contract.


3.) 26 Jan 2024 06:40:41
£35million, plus £4million a year in wages.Shi's "love child", has had a major impact on our FFP situation.
Hang your head in shame for this ridiculous signing (and a few more!)


4.) 26 Jan 2024 14:03:04
Rugeley with hindsight - always easy I acknowledge - paying several million to swap Jota, (now one of the best forwards in the country), for Hoever and Silva, (neither of whom were or ever will be Premier League quality), is mind blowingly terrible and has cost us a lot more than a few million pounds!
The even sadder part of course is that you didn't need hindsight to see this!
Although Jota has improved his consistency and his appettite, which seemingly had fallen away in his last few months at Wolves, was clearly a v high quality player.
Fabio, who we have discussed till the cows come home, however was obviously still a child who should have been in a youth program cleaning the boots of the senior pros not being paid more than them.
I do accept that Hoever was a prospect who sadly didn't develop. However we again hugely overpaid for him as the risk that he wouldn't develop was real and bit us!
As you say to repeat the insanity of this deal 12 months later with Guedes is v hard to swallow!
Not only would we not have any FFP problems (the 3 of them cost us over £25m a year in amort and wages or £75m + in a 3 year cycle) but we would have won an awful lot more games!
Tks Jeff!


5.) 26 Jan 2024 20:52:34
Maybe Diogo wanted to leave and he was basically on the bench because of Pedro.
So if a player wants to go, you pretty much should sell him or you will have players who don't want to be there in the dressing room.


6.) 26 Jan 2024 22:14:51
Handsome no doubt you are correct. At the time I thought the sale was ok.
He was a top quality player but his commitment levels had fallen for various reasons and he was inconsistent.
The price we sold him for was therefore fair.
However over paying by over £40m on Hoever and Silva AND paying them massively out of kilter with their real staus was not ok!
These 2 transfers (plus the Guedes one) are a key factor in our decline (on the pitch and off), post Seville


 

 

13 Dec 2023 17:59:43
According to goal.com today, Lopetegui is 'well placed' to be the next Man U head coach. Seems that Man U value his work at Wolves very highly.

Deep Throat

1.) 14 Dec 2023 06:34:46
Wouldn't be surprised deep throat. It'd be great to see him defeated at molineux on Feb 1st next year and hear the crowd, as we did with nunes, asking 'Jlo what's the score.'?.


2.) 14 Dec 2023 08:48:42
If he does get the job and keeps some of the privileged players they’ll be changing his name to flopitegue! ?


3.) 14 Dec 2023 09:51:22
Flopetegui. Love it. Old Trafford will just be a bigger pram to throw his toys out of.


4.) 14 Dec 2023 16:19:51
Don't think he threw his toys our of the pram.

Fosun signed him and promised him certain things and then changed their plans so that JLo couldn't do what he wanted.

He then asked to leave and offered to stay on until a replacement was found which Fosun found almost immediately.


5.) 14 Dec 2023 16:39:28
Wait until he sees how the Glaziers break promises.


6.) 14 Dec 2023 17:58:49
As long as they back him in tge transfer market, he won't care. Unfortunately, after last January, Fosun had to sell rather than buy players which meant that he couldn't implement his plan.


7.) 14 Dec 2023 19:50:48
But he could have stayed and decided to see how things went and a chance to show the prem his credentials but he walked out on us because he could spend hundreds of millions.


8.) 14 Dec 2023 20:48:59
All he had to do was wait it out one more season and then he'd have been given the resources he expected.

JLo is undoubtedly a great manager but he's a serial quitter and he'd have jumped ship for a "bigger" club within a couple of years anyway.


9.) 14 Dec 2023 22:32:13
Lupii, you say that Lopetegui is a 'serial' quitter. Apart from the Wokves role, can you shed some light on this as being sacked/relieved of duties as he was at Porto, Spain, Real Madrid and Sevilla suggests otherwise.

You are right that he could have waited a year but when he signed, he was promised things which Fosun had to U turn from due to FFP.

Luckily Gary O'Neil had a plan to work with no budget.


10.) 15 Dec 2023 02:22:07
Well he had quite a chunk of funds in January remember, he is just another Pepe needs a open chequebook, can't do things on a budget.
Anyway he is yestedays news we have a manager who knows how to work with a budget and wants to be at the club now.


11.) 15 Dec 2023 06:41:24
Exactly Rated lopetegi gone we move on.
Just add if GON hadn't been so good and we were in trouble as a lot on here thought we would be who would of the got the blame?
Would it be fosun and the scapegoat Shi or lopetegi for walking out days before the season started?
Imo I'm not sure.
But I think lopetegi has lack of morals for announcing the Real Madrid job whilst being the Spanish national manager preparing for the world Cup.This was not a good thing to do.


12.) 15 Dec 2023 11:21:09
And phil, correct me if I'm wrong, didn't the Saville job go because the club were selling their defenders and not buying to replace? Was he sacked or agreed departure over money/players?. No matter he came and took us off the bottom and kept us in the prem, might have been on false promises who knows, but he had us playing and the showing against man utd first game was down to him. He's a good manager with a mixed sense of loyalties.


13.) 15 Dec 2023 11:44:03
Hi Abbey,
I don't have any knowledge on the Seville circumstances, But your last sentence I do see and agree.

Just add I know a lot of fans are angry/annoyed with Shi and my wording sho the scapegoat I will explain so I haven't ruffled any feathers.

Through my eyes shi is ordered by fosun and does what is expected from him for his employer fosun.
If he hasn't he would not of been employed through all the mistakes the club made under his md role.
He had pay rise so its down to fosun and shi gets the flak as that's what he is paid to do.
This my opinion.


14.) 15 Dec 2023 21:30:22
And I'd agree phil but shi is the one who'd report back to his bosses and didn't they end up coming over to 'sort' things out themselves? No matter we are where we are now. Someone misled someone regarding Jlo. Or, jlo did jump and take the money and run. But he's gone and we've got GON who's done surprisingly well and believes in wolves fc. With some fresh blood in January I think we can make top 10 this season. It could go t*ts up given some aspects of our game but I believe he'll iron out the creases. I hope Cresswell joins us in Jan ideal to cover L back after jonny and RAN/Beuno.


15.) 16 Dec 2023 15:23:09
You are being very generous there Jas! He was sacked by Spain on the eve of a World Cup because he VERY shamelessly and VERY openly took on the Real job without even having the decency to have a single word with the Spanish FA (who had given him a MASSIVE chance considering his back ground at the time)!
However you look at it Lope handled the whole situation disgracefully so much so in fact that the Spanish FA fired him knowing full well it would ruin their chances at a World Cup but on point of principle because he had shown such a complete lack of respect for the role as national manager! Lope is a decent manager but you tell me a single job he's left on good terms?! However you dress it up the guy has a habit of always being on the look out for a better offer! Like others have said Fosun could have given him everything and he still would have jumped ship at the first job that came a long at a bigger club! Say what you want about GON but he ain't taking his job for granted, don't think that's EVER been true for Lope!


 

 

28 Oct 2023 23:50:29
If you check my post before the match I said 2-2. Unfortunately I was right but we deserved much better. I'm a great fan of GON but I underestimated how good we would be today. We deserved to win this but VAR let us down. And we might have had a penalty and even a red card against Newcastle. And one yellow against us but four against Newcastle says it all. They stole the point. Clearly GON is going places. We should be 10th right now.

Deep Throat

1.) 29 Oct 2023 15:13:34
Absolutely agree Deep Throat. Trouble is if GON carries on doing well he’ll be another manager other teams will be after come the new year! well, so the click baiters will have us believe.


 

 

26 Oct 2023 18:25:02
Is there a curse on departed Wolves players? Traore and Jimenez doing nothing at Fulham. Coady is bench warming in the championship. Neves has got one solitary assist in the Saudi league. Best of all, Nunes is looking useless at Citeh, and he was unceremoniously hooked at half time when they lost al Molineux! Neat bits of business by the mighty Wolves!

Deep Throat

1.) 27 Oct 2023 01:27:32
I don't think a curse, but more that Jimenez, Traore, Coady best years are behind them and I think that is what you are seeing. i'm sure Neves is doing just fine even though no goals and 1 assist since he starts most games and his team is undefeated and top of table. Nunes is just going to sit the bench (like Grealish and Phillips) until he proves to Pep he can play how Pep wants. I expect toward end of the season or end of games he will get more play time to show if he fits in there or not.


2.) 27 Oct 2023 07:25:41
My view as well NewJersey.Hobbs and his team did an excellent job this summer.
Jimenez, was great before his terrible injury, but now just a shadow of his former self. Any transfer fee was a bonus. Traore, well, should have stayed with us as an Impact Sub.
Coady, I would have liked to have him around the Club, but not to be and a very good transfer fee negotiated.
Neves, always going and very likely to be back in the Premiership with Newcastle soon. Great fee!
Nunes, never wanted to be more than one season at Wolves, again, great fee!
Important thing for Wolves is Shi not controlling our transfer business. After 3 seasons of wasting Fosun's money, he is now just "Backroom Staff", a Figure Head only, which is great for Wolves!


3.) 27 Oct 2023 12:58:27
Going slightly off the topic. Do we have to be thankful to Shi for guiding us through this ffp minefield? We have gone through a huge transition in the playing staff and come through it with a much younger team. Lost experience but gained some great new players.


4.) 27 Oct 2023 15:51:37
Short answer BW is NO!
Fosun took over 7 years ago. Under Dalrymple, we had 3 great seasons.
Shi then sacked Dairympole and others in the senior team and took direct control.
Disaster!.he and Sellers completely wasted the excellent Fosun financial support on over-priced non-performing players.
Shi now appears not to be involved in football decisions.not a coincidence we are now slowly developing a decent squad again thanks to Hobbs, Lopetegui and now O'Neil.
Shi should get on with building Income via Stadium Development and finding decent Investors and Sponsorship.another thing he has failed to do in the 7 years.


5.) 27 Oct 2023 18:00:21
BW - see my note in a similar thread below which mirrors Rugeley's post above.


6.) 27 Oct 2023 20:34:05
Cheers RW2 and oldgold. Just asking as it seems to be a minefield, which I'm sure some other clubs will fall foul of, but we've managed to get ourselves clear, just.
Chelsea and Forest must be treading a tightrope?


7.) 27 Oct 2023 22:36:12
Blackford - Indeed and i have no real idea of who and how close others are to the "line" but i would not be surprised if many others have "issues".
Wages/transfer fees are significantly out of kilter with football revenues, even allowing for the massive TV deals, and only those with huge non football related revenues - sponsorship, advertising merchandising etc can possibly survive long term in the current environment.

However as i said below I am still sceptical that Everton will be found guilty let alone punished with a points deduction as it opens up an enormous can of worms.
Everton will surely believe others are equally as guilty and may respond accordingly? Whilst certainly at the very least the 3 teams relegated last year will go after Everton/the league for their "unfair" relegation and loss of tems of millions of pounds?

Lawyers will make a fortune but the game will be reduced to chaos and the league a laughing stock unfit for purpose.
Consequently I don't quite see why they are going to open "Pandora's box!"


 

 

10 Oct 2023 18:57:01
Early days I know but the media's obsession that we don't score goals is looking more and more redundant now. After eight PL games we have scored nine goals. After the first eight games last season we had only scored three goals! So, it's a 300% improvement on last season.

Deep Throat

1.) 11 Oct 2023 07:04:13
Agree Deep Throat.baby steps, but it feels more promising after the 3 seasons of wasteful nonsense.
Hobbs and O'Neil seem to be steadying the ship, after all the efforts of Shi and Sellers to capsize it!


2.) 11 Oct 2023 09:22:11
The negative goal difference is down to the Brighton and Liverpool matches. Keeping the back tight like we did in the last 2 matches is the first priority. At the moment we look like we'll be ok but it's still early days.


3.) 11 Oct 2023 10:04:54
We have scored same number of goals as Man U and more than Palace in 9th place. Peter Crouch was a typical lazy pundit, saying Villa would beat us as Wolves 'don't score goals'. We're even scoring more goals than we get Howard Webb apologies. Things are looking up!


4.) 12 Oct 2023 12:22:59
We always beat Villa at Molineux and only scraped a draw, a good win against City and the first team to beat them won’t define our season, January will, Shi and Fosun are content to have a mediocre mid - table Club, thirteenth place or thereabouts is all we can expect for the foreseeable future, a lot of fans seem to have accepted mediocrity and are happy making up the numbers in the Premier League. As a Club we’re standing still, league position isn’t improving, stadium improvements are hardly mentioned or expected and Fosun are not delivering what they promised and aren’t likely to. The next Club on the long list of those outperforming us looks likely to be Birmingham City who seem to be getting their act together and Clubs with no ambition are the ones that get left by the wayside or the Championship as we like to refer to it.


5.) 12 Oct 2023 14:31:50
I don't agree Everan Aday.

Fosus spent big last Jan and if it wasn't for FFP we may have spent big in the summer but January 2024 is another year and we may lose a couple of players but we will be in a strong position to sign some good players too

With Newcastle turning the top 6 into a top 7 it's going to be hard to get into Europe the important thing is to stay in the PL and that means getting points off the bottom teams which I think we can do


6.) 12 Oct 2023 17:29:11
Sorry but I didn't agree either. We spent a lot under BL and JL. You can say we had some poor purchases of late Guedes, Nunes, Fabio, Maybe Podence and maybe paid over the odds for some others, but I believe Fosun has supported the Managers where possible. Unfortunately we are restricted by ffp regulations to just keep on spending. We've also gone through a huge transition with many of the old NES players moving on and younger players coming through. Based on what we acrued through sales of players in the summer I'm optimistic we'll get a striker in January. It's very difficult to break into the top 7 especially a club our size. I think we have to be realistic in that the club is progressing but can't be done overnight. Mid table mediocrity? I prefer established premier League team. There's probably many that wouldn't have thought that a few years ago.


7.) 12 Oct 2023 17:59:22
Everan. I disagree with your comments too.
First off, I think the Villa match was fairly equal and NOT "only scraped a draw" since we had opportunities to win.
Secondly, we may be mid-table, but we are in a transition from the team we had that brought us up from Championship to PL. Most of those guys are no longer with us.
Lastly regarding Birmingham, they may seem to be getting things together and on the up, but they aren't in PL yet. Once they arrive, then let's see how well they manage it. Burley, Luton and Sheffield are having a difficult time so far this year.


8.) 12 Oct 2023 18:54:06
Interesting thread albeit nothing to do with the first post in the thread.
Lots of sensible points.
Standing still does mean going backwards as - as Everan points out - others are straining every sinew to move forwards.
But the reality is we were and still are constrained by FFP.
We have had a number of years where we have spent big - surprised fans actually moan at Fosun for not spending as we have and in spades! - but under Jeff it has been spent catastrophically badly.
Today therefore it is sadly steady as you go and after the debacle of Ipswich and early season results not looking good I would have bitten your hand off to be where we are today - congrats GON and the team!
In fact I actually don't think we are going backwards from where we were this time last year at all - note JL simply performed the kind of miracle that managers of that quality will to mask the reality of the situation last spring. He, however, was never going to work long term under the regime we currently sit under - i.e. no money and Jeff as the boss!
But I don't think the road back to "next cab off the rank", where we were under Nuno, is going to be a quick one!
If you cut down a tree it takes years to grow back and Shi took a mighty big axe to this club's fortunes due to his lack of football knowledge and presumably humility - all he had to do was listen to the 3 geniuses he was employing!
I don't see us spending big this January - unless results mean we have to as relegation is looming (don't think it will be as several teams look far worse than us!).
However we might be able to add a player or two in the summer of 2024 to start us back on the road to respectability - one of the things I have hated about these last few years is that other fans no longer talk about us as the good guys challenging the establishment - that is now Brighton. Instead in most pundits and other fans view we are just an unfashionable team that moans a lot, plays awful football and has a terrible disciplinary record.
What we do in summer 2024 however will depend on a number of factors including if we can hang on to our good players - Neto being the obvious one - and just as importantly we can jettison the chaff - Guedes probably being the most pressing need.
Given Dawson's age we need a new CB (or 2 if we are playing 3 at the back regularly) and then it depends on your view.
Sa is pretty unpopular with many but I don't see him raising much cash and replacing for cheaper won't be easy?
Semedo discussed above. Kilman hated by many, but still might raise a decent fee etc etc .
Note if you sell first team players not chaff or squad players then you merely add to the need to buy players with all the costs and risks that entails.
An interesting thread but - as I said when the fixtures first came out this year - this was never going to be an easy start to the season and we probably have to have patience and faith that the club can turnaround both the season (already ahead of par for me!) and our longer term prospects under Hobbs and GON.


9.) 12 Oct 2023 19:17:45
I understand/agree that Fosuns original grand plan hasn't quite come to fruition but I think like most things in life its not that simple. Firstly there a VERY few owners that truly get to deliver what they originally plan/say, in fact the only ones that do are the stupidly wealthy owners and saddly they are a rare find! Not only rare but also very unlikely for a club in our current position (eg the stadium and a relatively saturated market in the midlands)! Have Fosun done what they intended yet I suspect not does that mean they haven't been successful absolutely not! We are well established in this league, more so than any other point in my life time in fact. Not sure how you've decided Brum are over taking us?! They've just signed Rooney from the MLS when we were in that position Fosun got Nuno from the Champs League for goodness sake! I actually hope Brum and Rooney do OK but they are still years behind us (WBA are about a decade:)!
I'm afraid it's not Fosuns fault just the reality/inequalities of Prem football these days, not sure what they are supposed to do about that exactly?! The top 7 places in this league is very much becoming a billions playground! Could Fosun have done better to adapt to the times probably but then every clubs fans will feel that way. It's also worth noting they could have done a whole LOT worse! Whilst I agree that mid table mediocrity is dull it's still a damn sight better than fighting for a promo place in the Champ! Just ask Brum ?


10.) 13 Oct 2023 16:08:02
I'm sorry Everan Aday, but your statement that we "always beat Villa at Molineux" destroys your credibility. We don't always, and we won't always. Your statement is a classic false premise, leading inevitably to an unsound conclusion. It's also an unfair criticism of a great Wolves performance in holding a dangerous team that had just put six goals past Brighton. Oh, and a 'good win' against Man City? Talk about damned by faint praise! We beat what is reckoned to be the best team in the world, and you call it just a good win? Incredible!


 

 

 

Deep Throat's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Jan 2024 11:08:31
Great research there, futureisoldgold.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jan 2024 12:28:54
If Fabio Silva couldn't hack it with Wolves, I don't think Jack Clarke will either. Silva had 45 minutes in a friendly in Spain for Rangers against relegated Hertha Berlin. Consensus was that he was too easily outmuscled playing as a striker.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

04 Jan 2024 17:35:32
Don't worry Dek. By all accounts we're selling the whole squad this month! When we are doing well there will always be interest in our players. The Neto to Arsenal rumour has been around for a few seasons and will one day probably happen, but on our terms, not Arsenal's. Gary is just about to have his first transfer window for Wolves and I expect it will be to our advantage.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

08 Dec 2023 17:59:41
Arddunby, you may be right but I think those three clubs are a bit out of his reach at the moment. He could have stayed at Wolves and burnished his PL credentials, but he didn't. The Palace job would allow him the opportunity to put himself in shop window for higher PL clubs to take note of. Given that he coached Real Madrid, Sevilla and the Spanish national side, he must be capable of better jobs than Forest.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Dec 2023 17:27:56
No way is Lopetegui joining Forest. He will have bigger fish to fry. He's hoping for Man U but will probably settle for Crystal Palace.

Deep Throat

 

 

 

Deep Throat's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Jan 2024 12:12:55
I hope Liverpool go for Jose Mourinho!
By the way, Fabio Silva is on the bench for Rangers in the lunchtime kickoff today. He really should be scoring for fun in the SPL.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Jan 2024 16:34:58
Lopetegui will be hoping for a call.
Thankfully GON is too inexperienced.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

25 Jan 2024 17:22:32
Looks like Gary is now hinting that there will be no incoming players this window for financial reasons. I'd take this with a pinch of salt. He may be trying to drive asking prices down. I can't believe we haven't identified a new striker at an affordable price, as we have let two leave on loan. But January is a notoriously expensive time to buy a striker.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

25 Jan 2024 13:32:49
You're right CB73. To your list of best player bargain buys I would add Doc at 85 grand from Bohemians in Ireland, to Joao Moutinho bought for £5m. For that matter, Robbie Keane and Steve Bull too.

Deep Throat

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Jan 2024 17:20:23
I recall many Wolves fans complaining that Forest were signing players left, right and centre a season ago. At least we have avoided the fate of Everton and Forest, who were both charged today. For all our departures I believe we now have a better squad and head coach these days.

Deep Throat

 

 





Change Consent