02 Oct 2013 14:12:44
Sako off to forest. done deal :(

Where the F is our ambition?

If a prem team came in then yeah let him go but forest ffs, they messed us about and lost the chance to have him, we should tell them to go play in the road.

. if morgan let's him go on loan then yet another promise broken when they said neither doyle nor sako will leave

1.) 02 Oct 2013
Sorry I'm probably in a minority here, but still not sure about him. On Saturday first half he was terrible but then he creates one and scores a thunderbolt. He does offer some badly needed flare and a goal out of nothing.

2.) 02 Oct 2013
Where does it say its a done deal

3.) 02 Oct 2013
We were promised that Doyle and Sako would NOT be loaned out! This better not be true. more lies from the board if it is.

4.) 02 Oct 2013
Didn't see any promises about not loaning either saki or Doyle.
I agree with that that Sako was worse than useless in the first half and in the NB on Saturday we were saying we'd be lucky to get 1.5M for sako after the first half. Crossed for one and scored a cracker but how many crosses & shots did he need for those. Not consistent enough and a luxury flair player in any league we as a team can't afford to carry. Get the best price you can Thelwell & Moxey and reinvest.

5.) 03 Oct 2013
I am sure if Sako goes he would be easy to replace at 4 mill who would contribute for 90 minutes.

6.) 03 Oct 2013
People are silly sako defo worth 4mill an if we get it we can't attract a four mill player to league 1 so no replacement unless u want grafters likr the mick days its just ridiculous we want flair an goals not graft an ground out results in this league

7.) 04 Oct 2013
04 Oct 2013 16:18:12
We wouldn't pay 4m for a L1 player. Look at who we have signed. Good players at this level, and all below 1m. Bank the 4m and spend it after promotion.